Gravettian admixture in the Chinchorro people

In this post I continue my analysis of several ancient DNA samples from the Americas. For my previous analyses of these samples, see the following posts:

At the bottom of this post is a plot for a K = 16 ADMIXTURE analysis that includes prehistoric samples from across Eurasia, the eight recently published Copper and Bronze Age samples from the Atapuerca Mountains in Spain, and all 23 of the recently published ancient samples from the Americas. Above the plot are the admixture percentages for the ancient American samples.

The correspondences between the colors and the components are as follows:

      Bushman
      Pygmy
      Western Negroid
      Eastern Negroid
      Aurignacian
      Gravettian
      Neolithic European
      Northern Middle Eastern
      Southern Middle Eastern
      Veddoid-Caucasoid hybrid
      Southern Mongoloid
      Northern Mongoloid
      Eskimo
      Northern Amerindian
      Southern Amerindian
      Australoid

As in my last two ADMIXTURE analyses of the Atapuerca and Eurasian genomes, in this analysis I use only transversion SNPs. Transversion SNPs are almost entirely unaffected by the damage that occurs to ancient DNA over time, and the benefit of using only transversion SNPs in an ADMIXTURE analysis is that the spurious Negroid admixture that is identified in ancient samples as a result of the small percentage of damaged transition SNPs is eliminated. The downside of using only transversion SNPs is that the information contained in the large percentage of undamaged transition SNPs is lost. This especially affects the ancient samples with the smallest numbers of SNPs, resulting in a lower-resolution analysis of those samples.

The numbers of transversion SNPs available for each of the ancient American samples are below.

Fuegian MA577         55944
Fuegian 895           41234
Fuegian 894           38517
Patagonian AM74       27673
British Columbia 939  23390
Fuegian 890           15456
Pericú BC25           12201
Micmac MARC1492       8818
Patagonian AM71       7544
Pericú BC30           7479
Brazilian Enoque65    4603
Pericú BC29           3301
Patagonian AM66       1847
Patagonian AM73       1360
Mex mummy MOM6        725
Pericú BC27           718
Fuegian MA572         691
Pericú BC23           640
Pericú BC28           634
Chinchorro mummy      611
Mex mummy F9          403
Patagonian AM72       269
Fuegian MA575         214

The Chinchorro sample was determined by this analysis to have 29.22% of the Gravettian component and 3.28% of the Aurignacian component. This estimate of 32.5% additional Caucasoid admixture is consistent with the results of the previous analyses, where the additional Caucasoid admixture was estimated at 27–36%.

My discovery of Gravettian admixture in a Chinchorro DNA sample from around 4000 BC is the most important ancient DNA discovery that has ever been made, because it destroys two academic orthodoxies at the same time, the first being that there were no Europeans in the Americas before the Vikings, and the second being that Indo-European languages were spread across Europe from the Pontic-Caspian steppe during the Copper, Bronze, and Iron Ages.

I expect that the fraudulent “scientific community” and the imbecilic “HBD community” will most likely continue to pretend that this discovery never happened, but I’m hereby notifying them that if any of them break ranks and attempt to take credit for my discovery, I will expose their plagiarism and thievery to the world.

                      939 M1492    F9  MOM6  BC23  BC25  BC27  BC28
Northern Amerindian 55.38 62.77 64.79 99.98 45.74 90.66 85.52 72.69
Southern Amerindian  7.99 12.64 27.11  0.00 34.90  9.32  9.88 12.25
Eskimo              28.07  8.51  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Northern Mongoloid   3.39  5.72  2.51  0.00  0.00  0.00  4.58 13.77
Gravettian           0.00  0.71  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Aurignacian          0.87  1.42  5.57  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Veddoid-Caucasoid    0.00  5.43  0.00  0.00  9.85  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mongoloid   4.30  2.79  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Australoid           0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  5.98  0.00  0.00  1.28
Neolithic European   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  3.51  0.00  0.00  0.00
Bushman              0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Pygmy                0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Eastern Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Northern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Western Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00

                     BC29  BC30 Eno65 Chinc  AM66  AM71  AM72  AM73
Northern Amerindian 99.98 86.59 49.32 67.48 65.43 71.65 66.95 89.38
Southern Amerindian  0.00 13.39 44.50  0.00 29.44 28.33 23.47 10.61
Eskimo               0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Northern Mongoloid   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  5.12  0.00  0.00  0.00
Gravettian           0.00  0.00  0.00 29.22  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Aurignacian          0.00  0.00  3.34  3.28  0.00  0.00  9.57  0.00
Veddoid-Caucasoid    0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mongoloid   0.00  0.00  2.82  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Australoid           0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Neolithic European   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Bushman              0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Pygmy                0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Eastern Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Northern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Western Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00

                     AM74 MA572 MA575 MA577   890   894   895
Northern Amerindian 71.10 61.74 99.98 66.28 63.20 64.57 64.00
Southern Amerindian 28.89 38.25  0.00 33.70 36.79 34.74 35.98
Eskimo               0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.67  0.00
Northern Mongoloid   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Gravettian           0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Aurignacian          0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Veddoid-Caucasoid    0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mongoloid   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Australoid           0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Neolithic European   0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Bushman              0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Pygmy                0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Eastern Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Northern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Western Negroid      0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00
Southern Mideastern  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00

all-16-1

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized
9 comments on “Gravettian admixture in the Chinchorro people
  1. Would you consider the “Poverty Point” mound near Monroe, Louisiana, USA, to be relevant to diffusionist prehistory, c.f.:

    T-shaped earthen structure preceded Moundville by more than 2,000 years
    http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20090307/NEWS/903061942/0/search

  2. Not sure whether this discovery might be relevant to the diffusionist speculations at this site, but the following paper on early irrigations systems in Peru might be worth a read:

    Tom D. Dillehay, Herbert H. Eling, Jr., and Jack Rossen, “Preceramic irrigation canals in the Peruvian Andes,” PNAS v102n47, November 22, 2005
    http://www.pnas.org/content/102/47/17241.full.pdf

  3. Just one more link of general interest in the discourse on diffusionism:

    Sorenson, John L. and Carl L. Johannessen
    “Scientific Evidence for Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Voyages,” Sino-Platonic Papers, n.133, April, 2004
    http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp133_precolumbian_voyages.pdf

    • Apologies, I have ceased to use Sorensen and Johannessen as sources. They bring up some information relevant to diffusionism, but, upon further examination, I must take exception to their “kitchen sink & etc.” approach to the subject.

  4. The Postman says:

    “The Ethnological Origins of the Palae-Amerindian and Amerindian Stocks by R. Gayre of Gayre”:

    http://www.unz.org/Pub/MankindQuarterly-1972apr-00213

  5. […] October 6, 2015: Gravettian admixture in the Chinchorro people […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories
%d bloggers like this: