At the bottom of this post is a plot for a K = 11 admixture analysis of Old World populations. Above it is a plot of the results of projecting Amerindian, Eskimo, and some Eastern Siberian populations onto the components produced by the Old World analysis.
Genetiker 
Reblogged this on Norah4you's Weblog and commented:
Once again thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this interesting analyse results.
Can you include this genome from EBA Asia Minor in a K12 & 16?
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SAMEA3712816
Kumtepe 4 (3550–2850 BC) is late Copper Age, not early Bronze Age. Here is a plot for a K = 13 analysis that includes it. It shows more of the medium blue component than the Copper Age Anatolian sample I1584 (3943–3708 BC), which indicates an increased Indo-European presence in western Asia Minor.
Thanks. Great work, as usual.
You are correct, technically speaking, but it’s still called ‘Bronze Age’ for some reason (anything after 3200 BC in southeastern Europe & Anatolia).
You are correct, technically speaking, but it’s still called ‘Bronze Age’ for some reason (anything after 3200 BC in southeastern Europe & Anatolia).
Only some parts of Southeastern Europe and Asia Minor had a Bronze Age material culture after 3200 BC. Others still had a Copper Age culture.
The paper on Kumtepe 4 and 6 states:
“We generated genome-wide sequence data from two Neolithic individuals…”
Kumtepe 4 was found in the layer Kumtepe IB, and the supplemental information states:
“Fishing became more important in the Late Chalcolithic period (Kumtepe IB)…”
More data from Anatolia http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)30850-8
Full sequences but no Y calls 5/8 are males
Do your magic ?