Below are the results of analyses of the sample ERS389795. This sample is one of five Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon samples from Hinxton, England that are analyzed in a paper that has not yet been published, but whose abstract is here.
The data indicate that ERS389795 was male. The Y-SNP calls don’t show which Y haplogroup ERS389795 belonged to, but they do show that he didn’t belong to haplogroups E, G, I1, J, R1a1, or T1a.
The mt-SNP calls show that ERS389795 belonged to mitochondrial haplogroup K1a1.
ERS389795 only had 0.08% of the K12b Gedrosia component, which indicates that he didn’t belong to Y haplogroup R1b. The modern-day English have on average 10.6% of the Gedrosia component.
globe4
- 85.44% European
- 8.40% Amerindian
- 4.29% African
- 1.87% Asian
globe10
- 72.39% Atlantic_Baltic
- 10.51% Southern
- 5.16% Neo_African
- 5.07% West_Asian
- 3.12% Siberian
- 2.55% Amerindian
- 0.97% Australasian
- 0.20% South_Asian
- 0.03% East_Asian
- 0.00% Palaeo_African
globe13
- 54.47% North_European
- 24.52% Mediterranean
- 6.60% Southwest_Asian
- 4.46% West_African
- 3.54% West_Asian
- 2.74% Siberian
- 2.55% Amerindian
- 0.67% Australasian
- 0.44% East_African
- 0.00% Arctic
- 0.00% East_Asian
- 0.00% Palaeo_African
- 0.00% South_Asian
K7b
- 75.10% Atlantic_Baltic
- 9.16% Southern
- 6.64% West_Asian
- 3.97% African
- 3.48% Siberian
- 1.64% East_Asian
- 0.01% South_Asian
K10a
- 62.51% Atlantic_Baltic
- 22.84% Mediterranean
- 3.57% Sub_Saharan
- 3.43% West_Asian
- 3.03% East_Asian
- 2.19% Red_Sea
- 2.02% Siberian
- 0.25% South_Asian
- 0.15% Palaeoafrican
- 0.00% Southeast_Asian
K12b
- 49.89% North_European
- 30.08% Atlantic_Med
- 9.78% Caucasus
- 3.63% East_Asian
- 3.19% Sub_Saharan
- 1.31% Northwest_African
- 1.16% Siberian
- 0.79% East_African
- 0.08% Gedrosia
- 0.07% South_Asian
- 0.00% Southeast_Asian
- 0.00% Southwest_Asian
dv3
- 41.46% West_European
- 24.44% East_European
- 17.31% Mediterranean
- 5.55% Northwest_African
- 3.17% South_Asian
- 2.69% Palaeo_African
- 1.70% West_Asian
- 1.21% Northeast_Asian
- 0.99% Southeast_Asian
- 0.85% Southwest_Asian
- 0.63% Neo_African
- 0.00% East_African
MDLP K=5
- 48.32% West-Eurasian
- 34.64% Paleo-mediterranean
- 7.27% East-Eurasian
- 6.59% Caucasian
- 3.17% South-Asian
MDLP K=6
- 53.33% West-Eurasian
- 27.98% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 7.02% East-Euroasian
- 5.17% Caucasian
- 3.59% South-Asian
- 2.92% North-West-Eurasian
MDLP K=7
- 53.00% West-Eurasian
- 27.23% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 6.98% Altaic-Turkic
- 5.04% Caucasian
- 4.15% Paleo-Scandinavian
- 3.59% South-Central-Asian
- 0.02% Volga-Uralic
MDLP K=8
- 45.18% East-European
- 21.98% West-European
- 17.98% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 6.04% Altaic-Turkic
- 4.24% Paleo-Scandinavian
- 3.66% South-Central-Asian
- 0.90% Caucasian
- 0.01% Volga-Finnic
MDLP K=9
- 44.19% East-European
- 21.33% West-European
- 17.61% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 5.98% Altaic-Turkic
- 4.24% Paleo-Scandinavian
- 3.60% South-Central-Asian
- 1.98% Paleo-Balkanic
- 1.05% Caucasian
- 0.02% Volga-Finnic
MDLP K=10
- 35.25% East-European
- 28.32% British
- 19.17% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 5.73% Altaic-Turkic
- 4.50% Paleo-North-European
- 3.31% South-Central-Asian
- 1.97% Paleo-Balkanic
- 1.71% Iberian
- 0.02% Caucasian
- 0.01% Volga-Finnic
MDLP K=11
- 34.90% East-European
- 27.42% Celto-Germanic
- 19.08% Mediterranean
- 5.13% Altaic-Turkic
- 4.62% Paleo-North-European
- 2.97% South-Central-Asian
- 2.59% Uralic-Permic
- 1.94% Paleo-Balkanic
- 1.33% Iberian
- 0.02% Caucasian
- 0.00% Volga-Uralic
MDLP K=12
- 26.46% Celto-Germanic
- 22.97% East-European
- 20.22% Balto-Finnic
- 17.82% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 3.76% Alatic-Turkic
- 2.77% Uralic-Permic
- 2.73% South-Central Asian
- 1.73% Paleo-Balkanic
- 0.85% Iberian
- 0.68% Paleo-North-European
- 0.01% Caucasian
- 0.00% Volga-Uralic
MDLP K=13
- 21.36% Altaic
- 14.03% Celto-Germanic
- 12.13% East-Mediterranean
- 11.80% Mediterrean
- 10.35% Baltic-Finnic
- 9.67% Iberian
- 8.70% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 4.65% South-Central-Asian
- 3.08% Uralic-Permic
- 2.60% Paleo-North-European
- 1.32% Caucasian
- 0.29% East-European
- 0.00% Volga-Uralic
MDLP K=14
- 22.38% Celto-Germanic
- 20.15% Balto-Slavic
- 18.92% Balto-Finnic
- 13.30% East-Mediterranean
- 12.79% Paleo-Mediterranean
- 4.07% Mediterranean
- 3.51% Altaic
- 2.22% Uralic-Permic
- 1.32% Paleo-Balkanic
- 1.01% South-Central-Asian
- 0.33% Paleo-Scandinavian
- 0.00% Caucasian
- 0.00% Iberian
- 0.00% Volga-Finnic
MDLP K=15
- 22.46% Celto-Germanic
- 20.23% Balto-Slavic
- 18.88% Balto-Finnic
- 13.40% East-Mediterranean
- 12.52% West-Mediterranean
- 3.88% Balkanic-1
- 3.79% West-Altaic
- 2.29% Uralic-Permic
- 1.35% Balkanic-2
- 0.95% South-Central-Asian
- 0.25% Paleo-North-European
- 0.00% Caucasian
- 0.00% East-Altaic
- 0.00% Iberian
- 0.00% Volga-Uralic
MDLP World-22
- 32.96% North-East-European
- 29.61% Atlantic_Mediterranean_Neolithic
- 14.30% North-European-Mesolithic
- 6.27% Mesoamerican
- 5.42% Indian
- 4.48% Pygmy
- 3.46% Near_East
- 2.91% Indo-Iranian
- 0.40% Indo-Tibetan
- 0.13% South-African
- 0.06% East-Siberean
- 0.01% South-America_Amerind
- 0.00% Arctic-Amerind
- 0.00% Austronesian
- 0.00% East-South-Asian
- 0.00% Melanesian
- 0.00% North-Amerind
- 0.00% North-Siberean
- 0.00% Paleo-Siberian
- 0.00% Samoedic
- 0.00% Sub-Saharian
- 0.00% West-Asian
MDLP Ancient Roots K17
- 45.66% Ancestral_East_European_ANE
- 23.08% West_European_HG
- 16.70% Ancestral_Mediterranean_EEF
- 3.16% Caucasian-Basal
- 2.29% Uralic
- 2.22% Ancestral_East_Siberian
- 1.81% Melano-Austronesian
- 1.39% Ancestral_South_Indian
- 1.31% African_Sub_Saharian
- 0.73% Ancestral_North_Indian
- 0.45% Archaic_African
- 0.45% Near-East-Basal
- 0.35% Ancestral_West_Siberian
- 0.28% Circumpolar
- 0.07% South_East_Asian
- 0.05% Amerindian
- 0.01% Ancestral_Sami-Finnic
MDLP Ancient Roots K18
- 48.40% North_West_European
- 20.94% East_European
- 9.71% Afroasiatic
- 4.84% East_Siberian
- 3.74% Roma
- 3.48% Mediterranean
- 2.30% West_Siberian
- 2.11% Volga-Uralic
- 1.89% South_Central_Asian
- 1.78% Archaic_African
- 0.80% East_African
- 0.01% Caucasian
- 0.00% Amerindian
- 0.00% Arctic
- 0.00% Melano-Austronesian
- 0.00% Sami-Finnic
- 0.00% South_East_Asian
- 0.00% South_Indian
MDLP K23b
- 35.13% European_Hunters_Gatherers
- 31.41% Caucasian
- 19.44% European_Early_Farmers
- 6.42% Ancestral-North-Eurasian
- 2.41% Ancestral-North-Indian
- 2.24% Archaic-Human
- 1.29% African-Pygmy
- 0.75% East-African
- 0.49% Near-East
- 0.22% East-Siberian
- 0.11% Ancestral-South-Indian
- 0.05% Archaic-African
- 0.04% North-African
- 0.00% Altaiс
- 0.00% Amerindian
- 0.00% Arctic
- 0.00% Austroloid
- 0.00% Austronesian
- 0.00% Khoisan
- 0.00% Melano-Polinesian
- 0.00% Paleo-Siberian
- 0.00% South-East-Asian
- 0.00% Subsaharian
Genetiker 
The abstract mentions one high coverage sequenced sample and 4 low coverage ones. Do you know if this is the high coverage one (and therefore from the Iron Age)?
It looks noisy to me. On k7b it shows ~4% African and ~5% Siberian+East Asian. For a sample that is max ~2000 y.o. it sounds too high.
The lack of Gedrosia component does sound intriguing.
I think that ERS389799 is the high coverage one, because it has the biggest files.
It is noisy, because of the small number of SNPs. The Negroid and Mongoloid admixture is noise.
The lack of the Gedrosia component indicates to me that Y haplogroups and autosomal components remained bound together for longer than I would have thought, and to a greater extent than I would have thought.
The Eurogenes blog is saying he is R1b L11+, but you are saying that he is R1b-, are we going to get another analysis of the Y DNA sometime soon?
Wesolowski also says that ERS389795 is Iron Age. Wrong.
And he says that ERS389795 is the high coverage genome. Also wrong.
Wesolowski got the idea that ERS389795 is R1b-L11 from Anthrogenica. The Y-SNP calls that they used are wrong. For example, the file they used shows R1a1-PF6234 as being positive. PF6234 is at the position 2657176, and ERS389795 had the ancestral C allele at position 2657176.
I’m not saying that I know that ERS389795 wasn’t R1b. I’m inferring that he wasn’t R1b, because he only had 0.08% of the Gedrosia component, and the Gedrosia component is strongly associated with R1b.
There’s no need to do another Y-DNA analysis. The calls are what they are.
Thanks for your reply, I hope someday soon we get a definitive answer as to the Anglo Saxon Y DNA Group.