Monthly Archives: April 2013

K = 16 admixture analysis of Mongoloids

In order to study admixture in Mongoloids I created a DIYDodecad calculator based on a K = 16 ADMIXTURE analysis of all of the non-Mongoloid populations in the HGDP dataset, along with the Dai. I expected the Dai to have

Posted in Uncategorized

K = 17 admixture analysis of Amerindians

At the bottom of this post is a K = 17 ADMIXTURE plot for all of the Old World populations in the HGDP dataset. Above it is an admixture plot for the HGDP Amerindian populations based on results from a

Posted in Uncategorized

Japanese are part proto-Nordic

In the K = 5 craniometric admixture analysis, the Caucasoid component was modal for the northern Japanese (from Hokkaido), and it also made up a lot of the admixture in the southern Japanese (from northern Kyushu). In the post I

Posted in Uncategorized

K = 4 admixture analysis of all HGDP Amerindian samples

At the bottom of this post is a K = 4 ADMIXTURE plot for Negroid, Mongoloid, Nordic, and Mediterranean populations from the HGDP dataset. Above it is an admixture plot for the HGDP Amerindian populations based on results from a

Posted in Uncategorized

Preliminary subracial analysis of the Caucasoid admixture in Karitiana sample HGDP00995

I created a DIYDodecad calculator based on a K = 3 ADMIXTURE analysis of all of the European populations in the HGDP dataset along with the Han Chinese. The plot for the ADMIXTURE analysis is below. The HGDP00511 French sample

Posted in Uncategorized

Amerindians have significant Caucasoid admixture, while most Europeans do not have significant Mongoloid admixture

In this paper from last year, David Reich and his subordinates at Harvard basically claimed that Mediterraneans and Amerindians are racially pure, while Nordics are Mediterranean-Amerindian mongrels. Then in this post from last year, Dienekes observed that his ADMIXTURE analysis

Posted in Uncategorized
Categories