F4 ratio estimation confirms Nordic admixture in Amerindians

I ran the F4 ratio estimation program from ADMIXTOOLS on the HGDP Amerindian populations to see how the results would compare with those from ADMIXTURE and DIYDodecad.

Referring to the phylogeny for F4 ratio estimation below, I used San for the O population, Dai for the C population, Orcadians for the B population, Sardinians for the A population, and Amerindians for the X populations.

f4-ratio

The results are below. The Nordic admixture proportions are in the alpha column, and are expressed as fractions of 1, not as percentages.

                 alpha     std. err  Z (null=0)
Karitiana     0.182781     0.021297      8.583
    Surui     0.211791     0.023151      9.148
Colombian     0.157253     0.020357      7.725
     Maya     0.204853     0.016572     12.362
     Pima     0.186089     0.019864      9.368

For comparison, here are the Nordic admixture percentages from the K = 17 admixture analysis of Amerindians:

              Surui Colombian  Maya Karitiana  Pima
Nordic        12.14     14.11 18.98     12.16 14.37

And here are the Nordic admixture percentages from the K = 16 admixture analysis of Mongoloids:

              Yakut Karitiana  Pima Surui Colombian  Maya Uygur Hazara
Nordic        12.51     15.96 17.71 16.48     16.74 21.90 16.70  15.37

There is good general agreement between all three analyses. They all put the Nordic admixture of the Amerindian populations in the 10 to 20 percent range.

Substituting Yoruba for San, Han for Dai, or Russians for Orcadians in the F4 ratio estimation does not significantly change the results.

Posted in Uncategorized

The cause of homosexuality

Homosexuality is a disease that greatly reduces Darwinian fitness, and yet it afflicts somewhere between 1 to 10 percent of people in almost every population on earth.

For over 10 years Greg Cochran has been pushing his theory that homosexuality is caused by a pathogen as an explanation for the above observation.

But there are many other observations about homosexuality that collectively Cochran’s theory fails to explain.

One of these observations is that homosexuality does not occur in hunter-gatherer populations.

In this paper on the sexual behavior of Biaka, or Aka, pygmies, the authors write

Another reason we conducted a study of sexual behavior was that several years ago we asked Aka men about homosexuality and masturbation and were surprised that they were not aware of these practices, did not have terms for them and how difficult it was to explain both sexual practices. They laughed as we tried to explain and describe the sexual activities. We thought that maybe they were shy or embarrassed individuals, but this would have been uncharacteristic of the Aka we had known so long.

All Aka and Ngandu indicated that homosexuality (gay or lesbian) was unknown or rare. The Aka, in particular, had a difficult time understanding the concept and mechanics of same sex relationships. No word existed and it was necessary to repeatedly describe the sexual act.

The abstract of this paper reads

Predictions were tested using the Human Relations Area Files database that (a) homo-sexuality would be rarer in hunter-gatherer societies and (b) psychosocial stressors of women would predict its increased frequency. Homosexual frequency decreased as a function of amount of gathering practiced and increased with size of the local community, supporting the first prediction. Lack of control by women in sexual matters predicted increased homosexuality, supporting the second prediction. These data constitute the first quantitative cross-cultural evidence for (a) environmental mediation of homosexuality and (b) Domer’s theory that maternal stress causes homosexuality. The data suggest that homosexuality would have been rarer in our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

In this paper, the author writes

These results strongly support the idea that homosexuality is increasingly likely to be present as population pressure increases. The percentages demonstrating the presence of homosexuality: 0 (Low, hunting and gathering), 33 (Low, hunting, gathering, and fishing), 44 (Medium, Horticulture, etc.), 57 (High, Intensive agriculture) demonstrate a marked correlation between the presence of homosexuality and the intensity of a society’s adaptation to the environment. That none of the exclusively hunter-gatherer societies had any significant manifestations of homosexuality is particularly noteworthy, especially considering that over half of high population pressure societies have significant expressions of homosexuality in their culture.

Another observation is the one made in this comment. Homosexuality occurs at a rate of 8% in male domesticated sheep, but it does not occur in the wild ancestor of the sheep, the mouflon.

In this comment the observation was made that homosexuality occurs at a higher rate in Negroids and Mestizos than in Caucasoids and non-Amerindian Mongoloids.

And in this comment, Peter Frost observed that homosexuality occurs at a higher rate in Nordics than in Mediterraneans.

Cochran’s theory requires us to believe in a pathogen that has infected every agricultural and industrial population that has ever existed, and no hunter-gatherer population that has ever existed.

A pathogen that induces homosexuality in two domesticated species, sheep and modern man, but not in any wild species on earth.

A pathogen that does not infect Biaka pygmy hunter-gatherers or Bushmen hunter-gatherers, but that does infect all of the agricultural Negroid populations that surround them.

A pathogen that infects Negroids and Mestizos at a higher rate than Caucasoids and non-Amerindian Mongoloids, wherever they are on earth.

A pathogen that infects Nordics at a higher rate than Mediterraneans, wherever they are on earth.

It’s absurd.

The only explanation that accounts for all of the above observations is that homosexuality is caused by agricultural and industrial diets.

Humans and their domesticated animals are the only species on earth that consume large amounts of grain and grain-derived foods.

They are the only species on earth that consume food that can be stored indefinitely without rotting.

Hundreds of millions of years of evolution designed animals to consume one kind of food, and humans and their domesticated animals consume something quite different.

And they only started doing so in the past 11,000 years.

Agricultural and industrial diets cause all of the misnamed “diseases of longevity”, “diseases of civilization”, and “diseases of affluence”. These include gout, osteoporosis, obesity, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, atherosclerosis, heart disease, stroke, and cancer.

There is no doubt that what a pregnant mother consumes can have a profound effect on the development of her child. The number one cause of mental retardation in the Western world is fetal alcohol exposure.

Sheep are fed hay and grains, neither of which are eaten by mouflon.

The Wikipedia article on hay says that “when horses are fed low-quality hay, they may develop an unhealthy, obese, ‘hay belly’ due to over-consumption of ‘empty’ calories”.

This is exactly analogous to the “wheat belly” caused by the consumption of wheat in humans.

The article then says that “If their type of feed is changed dramatically, or if they are fed moldy hay or hay containing toxic plants, they can become ill; colic is the leading cause of death in horses. Contaminated hay can also lead to respiratory problems in horses”.

This page on feeding sheep advises that “Average or poor quality hay should be fed during gestation, leaving the higher quality hay to be fed during lactation”.

It also says that “some producers feeding alfalfa hay to gestating ewes have experienced problems with vaginal prolapses, late term abortions, and milk fever”.

Mediterraneans in the Near East started practicing agriculture 11,000 years ago.

Mongoloids in China started practicing agriculture 9000 years ago.

Mediterraneans in southeastern Europe starting practicing agriculture 9000 years ago, but it took another 3000 years for agriculture to spread all the way to the Nordics in the northernmost parts of Europe.

Negroids and Amerindians didn’t start practicing agriculture until 5000 to 4000 years ago.

This means that Negroids and Amerindians have had 6000 to 7000 years less time to adapt to the harmful effects of an agricultural diet than Mediterraneans have had, 4000 to 5000 years less than non-Amerindian Mongoloids have had, and at least 1000 to 2000 years less than Nordics have had.

And it means that Nordics have had as much 5000 years less time to adapt to the harmful effects of an agricultural diet than Mediterraneans have had.

Another unnatural substance that started to be consumed as part of an agricultural diet is alcohol.

Humans are the only species on earth that drink alcohol.

It has been observed that Italians, Jews, Greeks, Portuguese, Spaniards, and the Chinese have high rates of alcohol consumption, and yet have very low rates of alcoholism.

On the other hand, the Irish, the English, Slavs, and Scandinavians have lower rates of alcohol consumption, and yet have much higher rates of alcoholism.

And Amerindians and Eskimos have some of the worst problems with alcoholism of any populations on earth.

The above pattern of observations is exactly what we would expect based on the amounts of time that Mediterraneans, non-Amerindian Mongoloids, Nordics, and Amerindians have had to adapt to an agricultural diet.

Homosexuality was rampant among the elite of ancient Greece and ancient Rome.

And this is exactly what we would expect.

The elite of ancient Greece and ancient Rome was comprised of the descendants of the Nordics who brought Indo-European languages to those areas, while the proletariat was comprised of the descendants of the earlier Mediterranean inhabitants of those areas.

And the Nordic elite of ancient Greece and ancient Rome had 1500 to 3000 years less time to adapt to an agricultural diet than Nordics of today.

We know that the ancient Jews had problems with homosexuality, because their writings contain numerous references to and injunctions against it.

For example, Leviticus 18:22:

Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.

And Leviticus 20:13:

If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

And of course there’s the story of Yahweh destroying Sodom and Gomorrah because the men there tried to homosexually rape some angels.

I predict that parents who eat a Paleolithic diet will have a much lower rate of homosexual children than the general population.

I can’t say that the rate will be zero, because there are now many unnatural substances in our environment, such as bisphenol A, that very likely also cause homosexuality.

Posted in Uncategorized

K = 16 admixture analysis of Mongoloids

In order to study admixture in Mongoloids I created a DIYDodecad calculator based on a K = 16 ADMIXTURE analysis of all of the non-Mongoloid populations in the HGDP dataset, along with the Dai. I expected the Dai to have the least amount of non-Mongoloid admixture, so I used them as the reference relative to which all of the other Mongoloid populations would be analyzed. At the bottom of the post are the mean admixture percentages, the calculator plot, and the ADMIXTURE plot.

The results do not give much support to my idea that the Japanese are especially genetically primed for Western civilization. Most of their Caucasoid admixture is from the Burusho component, not the Nordic component. They do have more of the Burusho and Nordic components than the main Han group, but the differences are not large. The Han from northern China have almost as much of the Burusho component as the Japanese, and they have more of the Nordic component than the Japanese.

The amount of both the Burusho and the Nordic components tends to be larger for the more northern populations.

The Melanesian and Papuan components are the genetic residue of the Polynesoids who once inhabited East Asia.

The Yoruba component is from the Negritoids who once inhabited parts of Asia. Both the Yoruba and Negritos have Y haplogroup DE.

With the removal of the Japanese and Yakut components from the calculator, the Amerindians now show more of the Nordic component.

I think that the Burusho, Brahui, and Kalash components are from Y C3-M217 proto-Caucasoids. As proto-Caucasoids, they would have been evolutionarily intermediate between Veddoids and Caucasoids. I think that their cranial morphology was Caucasoid, but that most of their other physical features were Veddoid. The map below of the distribution of C3-M217 gives a sense of what was once the distribution of these proto-Caucasoids.

c3-m217

I now think that the Amurians were some of these C3-M217 proto-Caucasoids, not Nordics or proto-Nordics.

I think that Japan was first peopled sometime before 30,000 BC by Y D2-M55 Polynesoids coming from the south. I think that the Jōmon were C3-M217 proto-Caucasoid Amurians who came to Japan sometime around 14,000 BC from the north, by way of Sakhalin.

The earthenware pottery characteristic of the Incipient Jōmon period first appears at around the same time in both northern Japan and the Amur River basin.

The above map shows that, within Japan, C3-M217 has its highest frequency in the northern part of Japan, and that the frequency is even higher in northern Sakhalin and around the Amur River.

The map also shows that C3-M217 has a secondary peak in Kyushu, and that the levels of C3-M217 are much lower in the middle of Japan, in Shikoku and Honshu. I think that the C3-M217 in the south of Japan is unrelated to the C3-M217 in the north of Japan, and that it arrived much later, possibly around the time of the Mongol invasions.

The above scenario for the peopling of Japan is consistent with the results of the K = 5 craniometric admixture analysis, which showed that the Caucasoid component is modal for the northern Japanese skulls, while the Polynesoid component is modal for the southern Japanese skulls.

The frequency of C3-M217 in the Ainu is between 12.5% and 25%, with the rest being D2-M55. This is consistent with the craniometric admixture analysis, which showed that the Polynesoid component is modal for the Ainu.

I still think that the people of the Mal’ta-Buret’ culture were Nordic. Most of the Venus figurines are associated with the Gravettian culture, and the Gravettian culture is associated with Y Hg I. The map of the distribution of I below shows the presence of I in an area immediately to the west of Lake Baikal, which is exactly where the Mal’ta-Buret’ culture was located.

i-m170

Some amount of the Nordic component is present in all of the Mongoloid individuals. Some of this may be due to the Y I people of the Mal’ta-Buret’ culture, but I think that most of it is from Y R1a Indo-European Nordics who spread out over Asia in the past 6000 years. The Tarim people, the Tocharians, the people of the Afanasevo and Andronovo cultures, and the Scythians were all part of this Nordic expansion.

Aside from the Amerindians, the Uygurs, and the Hazara, the HGDP Mongoloid population with the most of the Nordic component are the Yakuts. The Yakuts inhabit the Sakha Republic, and the map of the distribution of R1a below shows that R1a is present in the area of the Lena River and the Sakha Republic.

r1a

The population with the next largest amount of the Nordic component are the Mongols. The most famous Mongol in history is Genghis Khan. I recommend that people read the “Physical appearance” section of the Wikipedia article on Genghis Khan. It talks about his “glittering” ancestor who was “tall, long-bearded, red-haired, and green-eyed”.

You can see lots of photographs showing the influence of the Nordic element in Mongols in this thread.

Since the Amurians were not Nordic, that leaves only the Solutreans and the White Gods as the possible sources for the Nordic component in Amerindians.

                She   Han  Miao Tujia  Lahu Han-NChina    Yi Japanese
Dai           71.29 70.79 70.61 70.06 69.33      65.93 65.42    65.40
Burusho       15.24 16.17 16.34 16.93 16.82      19.09 19.88    19.79
Nordic         1.36  1.58  1.24  1.56  1.21       2.38  1.20     1.87
Melanesian     6.05  5.72  5.84  5.43  5.76       5.43  5.65     6.12
Brahui         1.80  1.68  1.75  1.43  2.63       2.61  2.40     2.21
Kalash         1.59  1.24  1.51  1.50  1.08       1.56  1.64     1.18
Papuan         1.40  1.50  1.47  1.82  1.98       1.46  2.30     2.08
Yoruba         0.42  0.49  0.43  0.49  0.53       0.53  0.58     0.63
Druze          0.19  0.23  0.17  0.17  0.08       0.32  0.15     0.14
Mediterranean  0.12  0.06  0.04  0.07  0.07       0.17  0.06     0.05
Palestinian    0.12  0.16  0.09  0.10  0.13       0.14  0.09     0.06
Bedouin        0.06  0.08  0.19  0.11  0.04       0.10  0.10     0.03
Biaka          0.16  0.10  0.14  0.13  0.10       0.13  0.15     0.10
Mozabite       0.07  0.08  0.07  0.07  0.14       0.11  0.13     0.17
Mbuti          0.09  0.08  0.10  0.11  0.08       0.03  0.18     0.13
San            0.03  0.02  0.01  0.02  0.02       0.01  0.04     0.05

               Naxi Cambodian Hezhen  Daur  Xibo    Tu Oroqen Mongola
Dai           64.79     62.86  62.30 60.90 60.43 60.30  60.02   59.72
Burusho       20.47     18.35  21.01 20.73 21.82 21.87  22.17   21.22
Nordic         1.80      1.56   3.73  4.89  5.28  3.50   5.06    5.66
Melanesian     5.05      5.81   5.56  5.65  4.74  5.25   5.71    5.17
Brahui         2.38      4.75   2.26  2.89  2.74  3.56   2.36    3.20
Kalash         1.81      1.90   1.57  1.56  1.74  1.94   1.51    1.87
Papuan         2.40      2.52   2.15  1.76  1.75  1.81   1.83    1.40
Yoruba         0.58      0.73   0.43  0.53  0.47  0.30   0.46    0.37
Druze          0.15      0.34   0.43  0.29  0.40  0.32   0.33    0.49
Mediterranean  0.02      0.09   0.09  0.15  0.13  0.17   0.03    0.20
Palestinian    0.07      0.37   0.03  0.14  0.15  0.26   0.08    0.10
Bedouin        0.13      0.06   0.12  0.14  0.16  0.21   0.13    0.15
Biaka          0.14      0.24   0.09  0.10  0.05  0.19   0.14    0.15
Mozabite       0.14      0.21   0.11  0.12  0.04  0.22   0.06    0.17
Mbuti          0.06      0.12   0.10  0.12  0.07  0.09   0.09    0.11
San            0.02      0.09   0.03  0.02  0.02  0.01   0.02    0.01

              Yakut Karitiana  Pima Surui Colombian  Maya Uygur Hazara
Dai           49.44     40.69 40.44 40.37     40.02 36.15 30.57  28.77
Burusho       24.27     29.07 27.42 28.59     28.30 25.82 25.27  25.39
Nordic        12.51     15.96 17.71 16.48     16.74 21.90 16.70  15.37
Melanesian     4.75      4.34  4.36  4.72      5.02  4.17  2.58   2.10
Brahui         3.98      3.48  3.74  3.83      3.66  3.96 14.17  17.70
Kalash         1.98      3.91  4.01  3.99      3.67  3.68  3.36   3.73
Papuan         1.64      1.90  1.57  1.50      0.78  1.15  0.53   0.88
Yoruba         0.38      0.26  0.36  0.26      1.23  1.77  0.17   0.26
Druze          0.28      0.01  0.07  0.04      0.12  0.28  2.30   1.80
Mediterranean  0.26      0.13  0.04  0.06      0.11  0.27  2.10   1.91
Palestinian    0.13      0.01  0.00  0.00      0.00  0.02  1.34   0.84
Bedouin        0.14      0.03  0.02  0.04      0.01  0.09  0.62   0.87
Biaka          0.07      0.13  0.11  0.03      0.25  0.29  0.02   0.08
Mozabite       0.09      0.00  0.00  0.05      0.00  0.25  0.20   0.19
Mbuti          0.06      0.04  0.15  0.04      0.07  0.12  0.05   0.08
San            0.02      0.02  0.01  0.01      0.01  0.05  0.01   0.03

k16-mongol

k16-non-mongol

Posted in Uncategorized

K = 17 admixture analysis of Amerindians

At the bottom of this post is a K = 17 ADMIXTURE plot for all of the Old World populations in the HGDP dataset. Above it is an admixture plot for the HGDP Amerindian populations based on results from a DIYDodecad calculator created from the ADMIXTURE analysis.

The mean admixture proportions, in percent, are below. I’ve used the modal populations as the names for most of the components. The two European components are Nordic and Mediterranean.

              Surui Colombian  Maya Karitiana  Pima
Japanese      34.57     32.11 28.72     31.80 31.27
Yakut         31.00     30.31 27.99     31.96 31.58
Nordic        12.14     14.11 18.98     12.16 14.37
Burusho       12.82     12.27 11.03     13.34 12.44
Dai            4.34      5.58  5.05      6.28  5.65
Kalash         3.48      3.10  3.13      3.33  3.33
Brahui         1.04      0.57  0.97      0.52  0.45
Yoruba         0.03      0.93  1.47      0.04  0.18
Melanesian     0.37      0.77  0.53      0.44  0.48
Druze          0.10      0.03  1.23      0.00  0.02
San            0.02      0.11  0.18      0.04  0.08
Mozabite       0.01      0.00  0.28      0.00  0.01
Mediterranean  0.00      0.08  0.23      0.00  0.01
Papuan         0.03      0.00  0.06      0.03  0.10
Mbuti          0.01      0.04  0.08      0.02  0.04
Bedouin        0.03      0.00  0.05      0.02  0.00
Palestinian    0.01      0.00  0.02      0.00  0.00

The Caucasoid admixture in the Japanese is probably causing the Caucasoid admixture in the Amerindians to be underestimated.

The Burusho component, along with the Kalash and Brahui components, made up a lot of the Caucasoid admixture found in the previous analyses. I think the presence of these components is the result of the Na-Dené migration to the Americas. The language spoken by the Burusho, Burushaski, has been related to the Yeniseian and Na-Dené language families. The Y haplogroup associated with the Na-Dené languages, C3-M217, is found at a frequency of 8.2% in the Burusho.

In this comment, Gregory76 associated haplogroups with Amerindian races. He associated Y Hg C with Veddoids speaking Algonquian–Wakashan and Equatorial languages, and Y Hg Q with Mongoloids speaking Na-Dené languages, among others. In a reply I pointed out the clear association of C with Na-Dené languages, noting that C is found everywhere Na-Dené is found. But C is also found in conjunction with the languages mentioned by Gregory76 as being associated with Veddoids and C. It’s found in the Cheyenne, the Chippewa, and the Algonquians, all of whom speak Algonquian–Wakashan languages. It’s also found in the Wayúu, whose language belongs to the Arawakan family, a subfamily of the Equatorial family.

There is no doubt that Y Hg C was originally a Veddoid haplogroup. Apparently the autosomal DNA of the people who carried C to the Americas was essentially Caucasoid, but they probably still had a rather Veddoid phenotype. The Burusho of today have substantial Indo-Iranian Nordic admixture, but as the photograph of Burusho below shows, they still have some Veddoid features.

burusho

You can also see Veddoid features in the photographs below of Apache, whose language belongs to the Na-Dené family.

apache

The Navajo also speak a language belonging to the Na-Dené family, and as the photographs below show, they too have Veddoid features.

navajo

I would expect that the genomes of speakers of Na-Dené, Algonquian–Wakashan, and Arawakan languages would show more of the Burusho, Kalash, and Brahui components than any of the HGDP Amerindian genomes, and that in general those components would be positively correlated with the frequency of C3-M217 in the Americas.

The small amounts of the Melanesian component indicate some gene flow between Oceania and the Americas.

The Druze component, found especially in the Maya, is probably from Phoenicians. Ancient Phoenicia was located in modern Lebanon, and Lebanon has the second largest population of Druze in the world today.

There are three possible sources for the Nordic component: the Amurians, the Solutreans, and the White Gods. Determining how much of the component each source contributed will require more analysis, and probably more ancient DNA as well.

k17-amer

k17-oldworld

Posted in Uncategorized

Japanese are part proto-Nordic

In the K = 5 craniometric admixture analysis, the Caucasoid component was modal for the northern Japanese (from Hokkaido), and it also made up a lot of the admixture in the southern Japanese (from northern Kyushu). In the post I dismissed this as spurious, saying “There’s no genetic, historical, or archaeological evidence that Caucasoids ever made up a large part of any Far Eastern population, so it’s very likely that the Caucasoid component is showing up in individuals from those populations because those individuals have low levels of archaic admixture”.

Then there are Dienekes’ craniometric f3 statistics showing that Japanese skulls are mixtures of Eskimo skulls and Peruvian skulls. My first explanation of this result, in this comment, was that Eskimo skulls were like those of the Mongoloid Yayoi, and Peruvian skulls were like those of the Polynesoid Jomon. But then the K = 4 craniometric admixture analysis showed that I got that backwards, and that it is the Eskimo skulls that are more Polynesoid, and the Peruvian skulls that are more Mongoloid. But now the K = 5 craniometric admixture analysis has shown that the Peruvian skulls are actually more Caucasoid than they are Mongoloid.

All of this led me to apply the same K = 4 DIYDodecad calculator that I applied to the Amerindians to the Japanese. And the results show that the Japanese are indeed partially Caucasoid. An admixture plot is below. The colors are the same as in the Amerindian plot.

k4-jap

The mean admixture proportions for the HGDP Japanese samples are 91.50% Mongoloid, 5.31% Nordic, 2.25% Mediterranean, and 0.94% Negroid. The total Caucasoid admixture is therefore 7.56%.

I think that the Negroid admixture is actually Negritoid. Y haplogroup D has a frequency of 87.5% in the Ainu and between 25% and 50% in the Japanese, depending on the region. D was originally a Negritoid haplogroup.

I think that the Mediterranean admixture is due to the fact that the Caucasoids who came to Japan came sometime in the middle of Nordic evolution, between 40 ka and 25 ka, and were therefore still partially Mediterranean.

Nordics or proto-Nordics at one time inhabited all of northern Eurasia, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. They were mammoth hunters, and they followed the herds over this entire range.

Archaeological evidence of this is found in the Mal’ta-Buret’ culture, near Lake Baikal. That culture produced Venus figurines out of mammoth ivory, dated to 23,000 years ago, that are very similar to those found all over Europe.

Joseph Birdsell believed that the prehistoric inhabitants of the area around the Amur River were Caucasoid. Birdsell was absolutely right about the peopling of Sahul, and I now believe that he was right about the Amurians as well.

The proto-Nordic admixture in the Japanese explains why they took so readily to Western civilization, and why today Japan is the most advanced nation in Asia.

Posted in Uncategorized

K = 4 admixture analysis of all HGDP Amerindian samples

At the bottom of this post is a K = 4 ADMIXTURE plot for Negroid, Mongoloid, Nordic, and Mediterranean populations from the HGDP dataset. Above it is an admixture plot for the HGDP Amerindian populations based on results from a DIYDodecad calculator created from the ADMIXTURE analysis.

Here are the mean admixture proportions for each Amerindian population, in the order Mongoloid, Nordic, Mediterranean, Negroid:

Surui: 62.86%, 34.16%, 1.93%, 1.04%

Karitiana: 62.51%, 34.70%, 1.68%, 1.10%

Pima: 61.62%, 35.46%, 1.59%, 1.34%

Colombian: 61.33%, 34.50%, 1.94%, 2.23%

Maya: 55.79%, 37.19%, 4.11%, 2.92%

The Nordic element is very evenly distributed across all of the Amerindian populations, from the Pima in Arizona and Sonora to the Karitiana and Surui in Brazil, which suggests that the element has been present in the Americas for a very long time.

The influence of the Nordic element can be seen in the light-colored hair of the Karitiana children in the photographs here and here, and in the photograph below (click to enlarge).

karitiana

I wonder if David Reich knows what the respective frequencies of light hair in Karitiana and stiff black hair in Nordics are.

The Mediterranean and Negroid elements are present in all of the populations, but the Maya have an excess. I think that both elements are the result of an ancient transatlantic slave trade conducted by Phoenician Semites.

The Olmec colossal heads in the photographs below are obviously Negroid.

Cabeza colosal número 1

olmec-2

olmec-3

olmec-4

olmec-5

olmec-6

Of course the fact that they’re obviously Negroid hasn’t prevented plenty of imbeciles from saying they’re not. The Wikipedia page on the subject is particularly funny. It tells us about the “mainstream scientific consensus”, and categorizes the subject as “pseudoarchaeology”. Somebody should inform the propagandists at Wikipedia that Truth is not democratic.

On the Wikipedia page on the Olmec civilization we read that Richard Diehl wrote “There can be no doubt that the heads depict the American Indian physical type still seen on the streets of Soteapan, Acayucan, and other towns in the region”. Well as the photograph of a Maya below shows, there’s some truth to that. But of course that doesn’t change the fact that the features seen in the Olmec colossal heads and in some Maya are Negroid.

maya

All of the Olmec colossal heads are wearing the kind of helmet that would have been worn in the Mesoamerican ballgame. So I think that the heads were statues of the ancient Mesoamerican equivalent of today’s Negro sports celebrities.

k4-a

k4

Posted in Uncategorized

Preliminary subracial analysis of the Caucasoid admixture in Karitiana sample HGDP00995

I created a DIYDodecad calculator based on a K = 3 ADMIXTURE analysis of all of the European populations in the HGDP dataset along with the Han Chinese. The plot for the ADMIXTURE analysis is below.

The HGDP00511 French sample was calculated as being 80.40% Nordic, 19.60% Mediterranean, and 0.00% Mongoloid.

The HGDP00995 Karitiana sample was calculated as being 34.07% Nordic, 1.65% Mediterranean, and 64.28% Mongoloid. So, according to this limited analysis, the Caucasoid admixture in HGDP00995 is 95.38% Nordic and 4.62% Mediterranean.

nord-med-p-3

Posted in Uncategorized
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.